AMP-AD Study Schema
Synapse Table: syn17083367
Number of Secondary Fields to show: 4
Display Name | Column Name | Facet Y/N | UI Mapping | Destination | Searchable Y/N | Search hint text |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access_Type |
| Icon | default icon = NULL controlled access = "Controlled" |
|
|
| Assay |
|
|
|
|
|
Program | Consortium |
| Secondary_Label_8 |
| Y | e.g. AMP-AD |
| Data_Contributor |
| Card_SubTitle |
| Y | e.g. LastName |
Data Types | DataType_All |
| Secondary_Label_1 |
| Y | e.g. Gene Expression |
| DataType_Name |
|
|
|
|
|
Diagnosis | Diagnosis_or_Model_System |
| Secondary_Label_2 |
| Y | e.g. LOAD |
Grant | Grant |
| Secondary_Label_9 |
| Y | e.g. U01AG046139 |
Model | Model_System |
|
|
| N |
|
| Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
Individuals | Number_of_Individuals |
| Secondary_Label_3 |
| N |
|
| Organism |
|
|
|
|
|
Tissue | Sample_Type |
| Secondary_Label_4 |
| Y | e.g. Temporal Cortex |
Species | Species |
| Secondary_Label_5 |
| Y | e.g. Drosophila |
| Study |
|
|
|
|
|
| Study_Description |
| Card_Description |
| Y | e.g. RNAseq |
| Study_Name |
| Card_Title | Link to Study Detail Page | Y | e.g. Mayo |
| Study_Type |
|
|
|
|
|
Cohort Type | Cohort_Type |
| Secondary_Label_6 |
|
|
|
Study Status | Study_Status |
| Secondary_Label_7 |
|
|
|
| Methods |
|
|
|
|
|
| Related_Studies |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments
@Michael Lee (Unlicensed) I don't think we have the above case right now, but I might be incorrect. Somewhat related to this, would it be OK if we have different types of icons for given a card type on each portal? For example, AMP-AD has Study icons that indicate if "Access_Type" is "Controlled" or "null". NF has (different) Study icons that indicate if a study is "active" or "completed".
We will absolutely want to have same icons for things like controlled access. I also think we should be able to support different icons for card types (as per Anna's comment) but we'd probably start by having the same one.
@Anna Greenwood (Unlicensed) the only thing that needs more clarify is the Icon mapping. My only requirement there is that no two portals want different icons for the same key- e.g. if amp-ad wants 'controlled' to map to one icon and nf wants 'controlled' to map to another icon that won't work. So to move forward I just need a standard set of icons and values to associate with them, I'm not sure how that is best decided? Queuing in @Ljubomir Bradic (Unlicensed) for thoughts on this too.