Summary and networks comparison
- Vitalina Komashko (Unlicensed)
Networks dissimilarity measure as it is defined here.
Beta vs M value (-batch, center, plate column and row (BCRC)) |
0.32 |
Beta vs M value (-batch, plate column and row (CENTER)) |
0.27 |
M value (BCRC) vs M value (CENTER) |
0.12 |
Beta (vertical) vs M value (-batch, center, plate column and row (BCRC)) (horizontal):
Beta vs M value (CENTER):
M value (BCRC) vs M value (Center):
traits |
Beta |
M value (BCRC) |
M value (BCR) |
mb |
mbc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% variance explained |
60-73% |
45-80% |
45-80% |
15-60% |
15-66% |
number of modules |
8 |
18 |
8 |
65 |
79 |
survival (P value=0.05) |
0 |
0 |
0 (red=0.0509) |
6 |
8 |
primary therapy outcome |
0 |
0 |
1 (red) |
|
|
age |
1 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
tumor grade |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
tumor stage |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Tumor residual disease |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Chromosomal clustering |
2 |
4 |
1 (brown) |
27 |
52 |
Gene Ontology |
keratinization |
keratinization |
keratinization |
weak |
weak |
November 16th, 2011 update: We decided to choose M value as a measure for methylation and normalization -batch, -center, -plate row, -plate column for all further analyses.