Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

4/19/21

What went well:

Jack started

What could go better:

Lynn leaving is making requirements gathering difficult. We are continuing to struggle with getting decision makers and proactive planning/documentation

Action Items:

Create project intake process (Ann) (still pending)

4/5/21 - Sprint Planning:

Demo (completed 3/29 across team)

Retro Notes:

What went well

Demo presentations on MTB meeting and received very positive feedback

We interviewed a candidate and are looking forward to adding to our team.

What could go better

We need to get better about getting things deployed quickly they have been sitting for weeks and weeks.

Estimating and Story pointing.

Getting Specs and Jira updated (Need to get better stories and documentation together that show upcoming work

Teams are asking for results but we are not getting enough upfront information or there is an expectation that a hallway convo becomes a requirement on the roadmap. We need to define, document and publish a roadmap and let people know where to look for it.

Proposed intake process around all projects on bridge team and get clear requirements etc

Need to do a better job with communicating expectations from stakeholders and to them as well.

Action Items:

Create project intake process (Ann)

need clear requests, understand design implications etc.

  • No labels