Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

...

  1. Amplification of 19q13.1-q13.2 sequences in ovarian cancer. G-band, FISH, and molecular studies, 1996. By FISH showed structural abnormalities, amplification and overexpression of AKT2 oncogene. 

Analyses of other correlated modules from the coexpression and comethylation (mb) networks. Is flanking a rule?

Here are few other graphs for the correlating coexpression and comethylation modules along with their stats (module size, overlap, overlap P value, correlation coefficient, association with survival). All Rho correlation coefficients are |Rho|=>0.4

Violet (Affy): size - 63, Cox P value - 0.83, major chromosome - X

Gold2 (mb): size - 27, Wald's P value - 0.24, major chromosome - X.

Overlap: 1, overlap P value: 0.079   
Image Added

Violetred (Affy): size - 53, Cox P value - 0.04, major chromosome - 13

Yellow4 (Affy): size - 26, Cox P value - 0.54, major chromosome - 13

Peru (mb): size - 134, Wald's P value - 0.059, major chromosome - 13.

Overlap (violetred vs peru): 16, overlap P value: 0

Overlap (yellow4 vs peru): 3, overlap P value: 0.54 
Image Added

Black (Affy): size - 133, Cox P value - 0.19, major chromosome - 9

Chocolate (mb): size - 109, Wald's P value - 0.026, major chromosome - 9.

Overlap: 24, overlap P value: 0
Image Added
Pink (Affy): size - 121, Cox P value - 0.18, major chromosome - 17

Firebrick (mb): size - 53, Wald's P value - 0.5, major chromosome - 17.

Overlap: 4, overlap P value: 0.002
Image Added
Greenyellow (Affy): size - 109, Cox P value - 0.74, major chromosome - 16

Forestgreen (mb): size - 91 , Wald's P value - 0.47, major chromosome - 16.

Overlap: 12, overlap P value: 0
Image Added

It seems to me that flanking of coexpression modules with comethylation modules correlated with them is not a rule. What I see is that CpG sited from cometh. module are sprinkled over regions of general clustering of the coexpressed genes.