Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Google and Facebook have both an automated and manual verification and review process, according to the type of client, scope and claims the client has access to. (See https://developers.google.com/apps-script/guides/client-verification and https://support.google.com/cloud/answer/9110914?hl=en).

Initial Implementation

As from the design review meeting held on the 11th of November 2019 the synapse team decided that due to the number of expected use cases a complete verification process is not needed and the initial implementation will be based on white listing on a case by case the oauth clients:

  1. Client will not be usable after creation until verified. If a client is being used while not verified an error message should include a the email to contact in order to verify the client.

  2. In the Web Client a form to submit a Jira issue to the ACT team to request the client verification will be shown (as part of

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem JIRA
    serverIdba6fb084-9827-3160-8067-8ac7470f78b2
    keySWC-4957
    )

  3. An administrative API (Only ACT and admins can invoke this endpoint) will be added to verify a client:

    Code Block
    PUT /admin/oauth2/client/{id}/verified?status=<boolean>

The initial proposed design below is still valid and can be taken into account in the future when/if the verification will be extended.

Proposed Approach for Synapse

...

In case of rejection a reason must be included explaining why. A user should be able to update the client and perform another submission after being rejected.

Domain validation

In addition to the manual approval or rejection, we should establish ownership of the domain referred to by the redirect uri (s) in the client as an additional trust layer. Note that while the specification does not enforce the scheme for redirect uris for web application types (See application_type in https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-registration-1_0.html#ClientMetadata), it allows custom schemes for "native" applications. Since we do not support native applications and the specification does not explicitly forbid it, we can enforce the redirect uri scheme to be https. In this way we can assume that we should always be able to verify the domain ownership.

...

If the sector_identifier_uri is provided during the client registration the list of redirect uris might potentially contain multiple domains. In order for a client to be validated all of the URIs needs to pass the domain validation.

Verification Status

A verification submission is associated with a status, one of: SUBMITTED, REJECTED, APPROVED. A verification approval is tied to the domain validation, the verification will include the information about the domain validation status. The verification cannot be approved if the domain is not validated.

...

We should allow to bypass the verification submission (e.g. for internal use or other mean of verification), in this case a submission from the user is not necessary and the client can be verified with a dedicated API call.

Proposed API

DT = Designated team for the verification review.

METHOD

URI

Notification

Request

Response

Description

POST

/oauth2/client/{id}/verification

To the DT to review the verification request

OAuthClientVerification

OAuthClientVerification

Allows the user to submit a new verification for the client. Only the creator of the client can make this call.

GET

/oauth2/client/{id}/verification

OAuthClientVerification

Gets the current verification for the client if any. Only the creator of the client can make this call.

GET

/oauth2/client/{id}/verification/validationCode

OAuthClientValidationCode

Allows the user to retrieve the validation code used for domain validation. The code is generated once when the verification is submitted.

POST

POST /oauth2/client/{id}/verification/status

To the verification creator

OAuthClientVerificationStatus

OAuthClientVerificationStatus

Allows the DT to approve/reject the verification. The possible state transitions are:

SUBMITTED → APPROVED

SUBMITTED → REJECTED

POSTPUT

/admin/oauth2/client/{id}/verified?status=<boolean>

Allows the DT to bypass the verification and set the client as verified or not independently from the verification.

GET

/oauth2/client/verification

OAuthClientVerificationList

Allows the DT to retrieve a paginated list of verifications (sorted by creation date desc), optional parameters:

  • status: Filter by a specific status, defaults to SUBMITTED

  • createdBy: Filter by the a specific creator

  • clientId: Filter by the given client id.

  • nextPageToken: Token received in the previous page, default null

...

Field

Type

Description

cliendId

long

The id of the client

code

string

The code for the domain validation for any of the registred redirect uris

User Interaction

There are three main actors involved in the verification

...

For C, the user should be informed if the client is not verified and the consent should be discouraged.

References

...


https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8252

...